ART AND SCIENCE
to the memory of Rene Rebetez

New Visualities, Architecture,
Science in New Art, Art and Science in History and Cultures, Medicine and Art, Artificial Intelligence, Art and Technology

SANART 4th International Symposium and Art Events
1-3 June 2000
METU Cultural and Convention Center, Ankara

Concept for 'Art and Science'

One of the explicitly stated problems of our times seems to be the separation of art and science. In fact, one of the most severe accusations of the 'enlightenment' is the development of a binary system of evaluation, where scientific and aesthetic values are divorced from each other.

As we approach the end of the century boundaries between art and science or between the body and the mind may no longer be as sharp as before. Yet, it is quite evident that aesthetic or artistic concerns are not treated with equal value as those that are deemed to be scientific and rational, or as those which can be empirically proven and quantitatively calculated.

Many philosophers, such as Foucault, Baudrillard, Althusser or Deleuze have complained about the resulting condition of culture, showing how irrational, in fact, this rationalism is. Michel Henry has called the resulting culture of this preference for the technical as 'La Barbarie'.

On the other hand, a close scrutiny of innovations and creative work proves that only the combined scientific and artistic sensibilities can produce valuable results. Einstein had stated, in a letter before his death, that 'Discovery is not the work of logical thought, even when the resulting product is related to a logical system.' One can cite many great thinkers who thought likewise. In both science and art the common denominator at the base of innovation and creativity is intuition. The scientist approaches the artist when he can go beyond the boundaries of the empirical to the intuitive. If innovation in science is also a work of genius and originality, the work of art, on the other hand, is also a product of profound thought and knowledge. Of course, in the arts knowledge and thought are not articulated the same way as they are in the scientific and technical realms. It is revealing that the word for art in ancient Greek was Tekne. One of the most interesting periods in western culture, to show the importance of the relation of art and science, is the renaissance where science was in the service of the arts, because truth was believed to be in the artistic realm.

We have become aware that since Aristotle nature has become an abstraction and therefore we have lost our empathic relation to it. A way to create a healthy relation to nature, which is imperative today, is through an aesthetic approach. Therefore, one of the present day issues where the integration of art and science is searched is the study of nature. There are other fields like medicine and psychology or urban planning, architecture, and industrial design where the necessity for both qualitative and quantitative approaches are evident. It is obvious that for the last few centuries, the priority given to the quantitative in the field of architecture, planning and design, has not created the best environments.

For the arts, the use of scientific knowledge or of technology never needed any justification. Today, the great practical advantages and mediatic possibilities created by high technology has given the arts new impetus and have opened new horizons. There are many artists working directly in the field of high technology. This means that new types of arts, which are highly technological in method have been developing and will continue to develop. Of course the first that come to mind are photography and cinematography. But today we have many new additions to the list of video arts, such as different possibilities within computer art.

Less obvious are the new areas of concern and subject matter from the realm of science and technology which are interesting artists. One can cite ecological art where knowledge about biology or zoology, or social art where social research may be necessary. There are also artists who work with material produced through scientific investigations, such as radiology or with results of research such as in the fields of geology, geography, medicine, etc.

On the other hand, there are many discoveries in the scientific arena which have brought to our attention facts which are worthy of being called art works. All new knowledge about nature and about the earth and heavens show us the aesthetic treasure of the world. From this point of view what many scientists have to show us today are not less marvelous and inspiring than art works.

The year 2000 will be a most appropriate time for artists and scientists to come together to work and to define common questions and common interests. Such an opportunity will be a natural celebration for 2000.

Download Symposium Concept Paper in PDF : English version, Turkish version


Symposium Concept | Symposium Program | Exhibitions & Concert | Participants

SANART Association of Aesthethics and Visual Culture © 2002